Ken coolly serves the hottest news stories and has played, we think, every game ever made.
Published:
Path of Exile 2 developer Grinding Gear Games is making a whole lot of changes for its big 1.0 launch in December, but one of the smallest additions could prove to be among its most valuable, not only for players but also for the studio. At Exilecon, I sat down for a behind-the-scenes roundtable interview with PoE 2 Game Directors Jonathan Rogers and Mark Roberts, where we talked about the decision to implement a death recap feature, the value of build permanence in RPGs, and how it “screwed up” one of the most beloved parts of the first game.
If you were watching the full Path of Exile 2 1.0 reveal at Exilecon 2026 closely, you might have caught one moment during the presentation where Roberts died while piloting the new Shadow class. He maintains it wasn’t a deliberate part of the plan, but it did provide a perfect opportunity for GGG to give us a glimpse of the new ‘Death Summary’ screen, which breaks down the exact details of who and what killed you, how long it took, and what you might have been able to do to prevent it.
“I was a little bit worried about this initially,” Rogers tells us, “because I was really worried that it wasn’t going to be useful enough, or accurate enough, but we got it to a place that I’m fairly happy with.” He says the one thing it currently struggles with most is tracking damage over time. “Poison and that kind of stuff, we do tell you that you took it, but we don’t know where it came from, unfortunately.” He says this is “a limitation of the implementation that we probably will get to fix eventually.”
The most important thing for Rogers wasn’t just showing the various types of damage you took, but also the percentage of each that had been mitigated. “The idea here is if you look and see, ‘Oh, there’s lots of unmitigated fire damage,’ well maybe I need to increase my resistance to that. This is my goal – to try and drive you towards, ‘What is the thing I need to fix about my character to have avoided this?'”
The other thing that I think will be interesting,” he adds with a chuckle, “is I think it’ll actually give players an avenue to complain about the correct things. Because sometimes we just have monsters that have wrong balance values, it just happens. And players, in the heat of battle, you just don’t know what it was. So now you’ll have, ‘This particular monster is the one that has damage that’s off the hook,’ and that will actually allow us to direct us to that.”
This isn’t completely new to the team, he notes – GGG’s internal tools do track metrics for which monsters are the most lethal – but he says “it’ll be really nice to actually be able to expose that a little bit better.” Could we see the feature make its way to PoE 1 in the future? “Honestly, I hadn’t even thought about that,” Rogers responds. He explains that it’d require some extra work to implement, because despite sharing their engine the gameplay of the two are handled separately, but Roberts says, “We’ll try to.”
PoE 2 has seen quite a few big steps towards convenience, whether that be gold respecs, unlocking the entire Atlas tree on a single character, or even a suggestion from Rogers that the team is considering allowing players to ‘recut’ Skill and Support Gems. Nowadays, there’s a notable divide between hardcore players who come in with their full build planned out, who are unlikely to make many ‘mistakes’ along the way, and less-experienced players who would be more likely to give up than work to fix a problem. With this in mind, I ask the pair whether they think that the era of build permanence is behind us?
“I hope not, because to me it’s quite important,” Rogers answers. “People often ask us, ‘Why is respeccing not just free?’ People say that all the time. The reason is because you lose the sense of context of your character, the sense that this is your character.” He admits it’s “one of those things that’s hard to quantify,” and that its value will vary wildly from player to player. “People say, ‘Oh, I just want to do it;’ It’s really hard to say, ‘But it’s actually better for you not to.’ It’s a really hard thing to sell to people.”
As one example, he points to times where GGG has altered the layout of the passive skill tree. Any time this happens, all affected nodes that were allocated get refunded to players so that they can spend them elsewhere, but Rogers remarks that “those players are honestly less likely to return, because they go in and think, ‘I don’t even know what I was doing anymore.'”
To Rogers, the value of respeccing is more about “being able to adapt slowly over time,” not changing to an entirely different build. “There’s also just the thing of, we are a game where we do want you to experiment with different builds by playing through the whole campaign again on different characters. That’s just part of the experience. So yeah, it’s one of those – it’s not a popular opinion for us to have, but I think it is one that I think is better.”
Grinding Gear Games has shown a willingness to move with the times – I’ve spoken to Roberts before about not fearing fundamental changes – but there are still important lines to draw. “It’s funny,” Rogers muses, “There are a lot of things that I’ve held onto very dearly that we have compromised on, and to some extent we’ve compromised on this [character respecs] as well by making it easier over time. But I don’t want to ever fully compromise on it, because I think it’s something that would actually hurt the game.”
There are some aspects where GGG is willing to admit defeat. It has been improving tutorials and introductions to the various mechanics for PoE 2’s 1.0 launch, but Rogers brings up a conversation he had with Warframe developer Digital Extremes. “They were saying that, over the years, they’ve made so many attempts at trying to tutorialize more mechanics and explain more things to new players, and they kind of said that all of those ultimately didn’t matter nearly as much as what the community was creating.”
Other parts are too baked into the existing audience to reasonably shift. If you’ve been confused why item tiers are better as the number goes up, but affix tiers are better as their number goes down, Rogers explains that the team had wanted to fix this for PoE 2’s initial early access launch. “What happened was that players from Path of Exile 1 were so used to the idea that T1 means ‘the top’ that we just literally couldn’t do it. We actually did deploy with it, and then we had to undo it.”
As for what he’s most excited to watch players discover, Rogers mentions the massive redesign for unique items, which aims to ensure that every single one does something worthwhile, and can theoretically scale as you progress through the game. “It’s funny because Path of Exile 1 was known as the game with the great itemization system, and somehow we managed to screw that up,” he says. “So that’s something I’m really glad we’ve improved.”
Uniques in PoE 2 “just were not in a good place with the stuff we released in 0.1.0,” he recalls. “The stuff we did after that was all great, but that was all kind of endgame, it wasn’t really the core drop pool as you’re just coming up through the levels. That stuff wasn’t cool, and now it really is cool – there’s just so much cool stuff there.” Sounds cool to me. I’m certainly intrigued by the likes of the new-look Radiant Grief, which starts setting all enemies in close proximity to you ablaze using its associated Radiance skill.
“I remember I was even saying to Mark, maybe seven or eight months ago, ‘You know what? I just realized that only one time have I had the experience of getting a unique at level 20 and actually putting it on. That’s not a good sign, if that’s the case, that’s really bad.’ So we kind of had to fix it.”
Path of Exile 2 hits version 1.0 on Friday, December 11, when it will become free to play for all users. If you’re craving more details in the run-up to release, be sure to check my full rundown of the PoE 2 Exilecon keynote, along with more from Rogers and Roberts discussing the new Conquerors of Wraeclast league mechanic, and their future plans for the two missing classes, the Templar and Marauder.
Keep scrolling for next article